The following is a very
interesting article written by an atheist.
“In the recent U.S.
Supreme Court case Greece v. Galloway, the five conservative
justices ruled that sectarian content is permissible in public invocations and
official prayer, while the four liberal dissenting justices felt that religious
leaders should give nonsectarian prayers at government functions. I disagree
with all nine justices. Their opinions reminded me of the quip from former
Justice Potter Stewart that while he couldn’t define pornography, “I know it
when I see it.”
I
can neither define nor have I seen a nonsectarian prayer, but I know a
sectarian prayer when I see it. Justice Anthony Kennedy, arguing for the
majority in theGreece v. Galloway case,
said that the government should not “act as supervisors and censors of
religious speech,” yet went on to describe when they should. Kennedy added that
clerics should not “denigrate nonbelievers or religious minorities, threaten
damnation, or preach conversion.”
Why
should the government censor a preacher who feels called to warn us that we
will all burn in hell unless we accept Jesus as our personal lord and savior?
If Pope Francis were to give an invocation in a public forum, should we caution
him against focusing on Satan and exorcisms, as he is doing more frequently than recent
popes?”
Read
the complete article at -- http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2014/05/15/why-the-supreme-courts-conservative-and-liberal-judges-are-all-greek-to-me/32089
Comments
Post a Comment