Skip to main content

The Fuse that Ignited the Middle East

Each of us sees the world through his or her eyes, but when we look at the “same” thing what we see may vary – a little or a lot.  This is an important blog and I believe that I need to provide you with some background information about my way of looking at the world so you can understand “how” I see, even if you what you see looks different.

1980 – I was at a critical juncture in my life and had just recommitted my life to God. I purchased a new Bible and, while sitting at the kitchen table, opened it prayed, “Show me what I need to know.” Instantly, this came into my mind – “Unless you know how words work you cannot understand one word of the Bible.” I took that as an answer to my prayer and set out to discover How Words Work.

1984 – I created what I called The Law of Language -- A word is a symbol or group of symbols with an attached bundle of associations and those associations are a product of the Source’s culture, historical time period, geographical location and personal experiences. (A Source is the sender of the words [author or speaker] and a Receptor is the receiver of the words [reader or hearer]). I became aware of the importance of identifying the Source when trying to understand any message, especially of the words of my Bible. My goal became to learning as much as possible about the Source – the Source’s culture, historical time period, geographical location and personal experiences.

1988 – I created the Guiding Principle for Bible StudyMy beliefs will be large enough to include all of the facts; open enough to be tested; and, flexible enough to change when error or new facts are discovered. I began classifying what I was hearing and reading as opinion, belief, truth or fact. Even though they all may sound the same – only facts are verifiable and a red flag goes up when opinions, beliefs or truths conflict with facts.  

1996 – I read The New Science of the Meme by Richard Brodie and was introduced to “memes” -- A meme is a unit of information in a mind whose existence influences events such that more copies of it are created in other minds. Our brain is like the hardware of a computer and memes are like the software. It is through memes that we assign meaning to things and create strategies and associations related to those meanings.

2010 – I created the TOV Standard as a result of research focused on the first chapter of Genesis. The TOV Standard is the standard the Creator used to measure His actions -- For something to be TOV it must protect life, preserve life, make life more functional and improve the quality of life. Instead of using terms like “god” or “bad” / “right” or “wrong” as a standard I changed to TOV or RA -- For something to be RA it must destroy or harm life, threaten life, make life less functional and diminish the quality of life. No matter what one calls their actions – good, bad, right, or wrong – what we need to know is how those actions affect the real lives of people.

Please keep the above things in mind as you read about events that you have probably never heard anything about before and weren’t taught in school. The source of this information is Edwin Black and his book – British Petroleum and the Redline Agreement (a book that should be must reading for anyone interested in the events taking place in the Middle East).

An event that set a series of events in motion that are affecting millions of lives today took place 95 years ago today (underlines have been added to highlight points).

April 24, 1920Berthelot-Cadman Agreement, a secret  deal between France and Great Britain to divide up the oil of Europe, Asia Minor, North Africa and Mesopotamia, was initialed by Frenchman M. Philippe Berthelot, director-general of the commercial affairs section of the Foreign Ministry, and John Cadman, Britain’s latest oil czar. The following are found in the agreement:

“By order of the two Governments of France and Great Britain the undersigned representatives have resumed, by mutual consent, the consideration of an agreement regarding petroleum. This agreement is based on the principles of cordial co-operation and reciprocity in those countries where oil interest of the two nations can be usefully united.”

“Mesopotamia – The British Government undertake to grant to the French Government, or its nominee, 25 per cent of the net output of crude oil at current market rates which His Majesty’s Government may secure from the Mesopotamian oilfields, in the event of their being developed by Government action; or in the event of a private petroleum company being used to develop the Mesopotamian oilfields, the British Government will place at the disposal of the French Government a share of 25 per cent in such a company . . . It is also understood that the said petroleum company shall be under permanent British control.”

Clause 8 committed both France and England to each offer a 10 percent participation of the private company to a Mesopotamian government if such a government emerged.

Clause 9 assured that “the British Government agree to support arrangements by which the French Government may procure from the Anglo-Persian Company supplies of oil, which may be piped from Persia to the Mediterranean through any pipeline which may have been constructed within the French mandated territory and in regard to which France has given special facilities, up to the extent of 25 per cent of the oil so piped, on such terms and conditions as my be mutually agreed between the French Government and the Anglo-Persian Company.”

April 25, 1920 – The initialed Berthelot-Cadman agree confirmed and then signed by the two heads of state, British Prime Minister David Lloyd George and newly elected French president Alexandre Millerand.

News of the mandates, denying Arab sovereignty in Syria quickly burned throughout the Arab world.

May 8, 1920 – Sharif  Faisal sent a formal protest to the Supreme Council of the Peace Conference that he “was much surprised to learn, through public channels, the decision taken at the Conference of San Remo on the Arab countries detached from Turkey . . . The wishes of the inhabitants have not been taken into accounts in the assignment of these mandates . . . The Arabs, fully conscious of their rights and their duties, did not hesitate to take up arms against their co-religionists, and to sacrifice their noblest blood in defense of the Right, thereby rendering abortive the threatened Holy War [declared by the Ottoman Empire], which the Turks and Germans wished to exploit in their struggle with the Entente [the Allies]. . . nothing less than their complete deliverance from a foreign yoke, and the establishment of a free and independent government, which would allow them [the Arabs] to resume their place in the concert of nations . . . The decision of San Remo puts an end to this hope. The moderate elements in the young nation, who have endeavored, and are still endeavoring, to guide it towards a policy of sincere collaboration with the Allies, are now discouraged and rendered powerless by this decision.” Arab militancy and violence across the occupied Mideast ratcheted up.

May 18, 1920 – Britain’s foreign secretary cabled Paris: “The French authorities must be the best judges of the military measures necessary to control the local situation, and . . . they have complete authority in taking such measures.” Quickly, French president Millerand confirmed to General Gourand, “Action against Faisal in indispensable and urgent.” Gourand issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Faisal to desist and facilitate French efforts to restore order – or else. The ultimatum was calculated to be unanswerable because of the sheer difficulties of rapid communication. Faisal instantly agreed to the demand, but his reply came one day late.

July 24, 1920 – French forces continued their invasion toward Damascus. The Arabs were no match for the modern warfare that had emerged over the recent years. The French slaughtered the Arabs within eight hours.

July 24, 1920 – The same day the secret agreement became public. Clearly the French and British had divided up the Middle East for its oil.

July 24, 1920 – The same day the Zionist Conference concluded in London. Its crowning resolution created Karen Hayesod organization to support the Jewish National Fund with cash donations from Jews worldwide to legally purchase lands for kibbutizin and to finance the formation of new Jewish villages in Palestine.

July 24, 1920 – The same day, for the Arabs, it was over. The Jews had gained Palestine. The West had gained oil. The Arabs had lost Syria. For the Arab world this was to be Am al-Nakba – “The Year of the Catastrophe.”

The three intertwined evils – the infidel European Allies, the infidel Zionists, and the black substance the West cravedbecame conflated in the Arab mind to create one great Satan. Indeed, these three evils would galvanize the Arab consciousness for virtually the next century. For the first time in centuries, the Arabs stopped fighting each other. Sunni and Shi’a, tribal enemies, those of the desert and those of the city, the intellectual and the peasant – all could unite under one Islamic banner, because this was Am al-Nakba. Forevermore, 1920 would be a black year in the collective Arab Consciousness. Britain and France dreamed of and could taste the oil that had not yet been drilled and that had not yet flowed. The Arabs wanted that taste to be bitter and bloody. Now, 95 years later – has anything changed?

Remember the date April 24, 1920 -- and the events it set in motion that would lead to millions of lost lives, billions of dollars of profits for an elite few, over a trillion dollars spent on war and charged to taxpayers, millions who live with hatred, fear and anger of people they know nothing about – because of a single secret agreement. Add the above facts to your knowledge of the problems that exist in the Middle East today. Become aware of the memes that have been created to reflect and feed the hatred, fear and anger – by those on all sides.

When I use the guidelines and TOV Standard to measure the above events -- they are RA (destroy or harm life, threaten life, make life less functional and diminish the quality of life) for millions of people on all sides involved. At least, that’s how my mind sees it. Mark your calendars and remember April 24, 1920.

The research that revealed the above the information was done by Edwin Black and is found in his book – British Petroleum and the Redline Agreement – on pages 130-134. For information about this book and his many other books go to -- http://edwinblack.com/

Shalom,
Jim Myers

If you consider the above information valuable please do two things:

(1) Share it with others.



If you consider my guidelines for doing research and measuring historical events valuable and important enough to be worthy of your support -- make a donation by clicking here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why did they lay their coats at Saul's feet?

The witnesses, laying their coats at the feet of Saul, were the men that would cast the first stones at Stephen in Acts 7. Why did they all lay their coats at Saul’s feet? The Talmud contains a very interesting account of the act of stoning that may provide the answer. “When the trial was over, they take him [the condemned person] out to be stoned. The place of stoning was at a distance from the court, as it is said, ‘Take out the one who has cursed.’ [i] A man stands at the entrance of the court; in his hand is a signaling flag [Hebrew   sudarin = sudar , ‘scarf, sweater’]. A horseman was stationed far away but within sight of him. If one [of the judges] says, ‘I have something [more] to say in his favor,’ he [the signaler] waves the   sudarin , and the horseman runs and stops them [from stoning him]. Even if [the condemned person] himself says, ‘I have something to say in my favor,’ they bring him back, even four of five times, only provided that there is some substance to what he

Are Saul and Paul the Same Person?

There has always been some confusion over whether Saul and Paul is the same person. The confusion begins in the Book of Acts. ● “Then Barnabas departed for Tarsus to seek Saul . . . he brought him to Antioch . . . for a whole year they taught a great many people. And the disciples were first called ‘ Christians ’ in Antioch .” ( Acts 11:25-26 ) ● “ Then Agrippa said to Paul , `You almost persuade me to become a Christian .’” ( Acts 26:28) ● “ Then Saul , who also  is called   Paul . . . ” ( Acts 13:9a ) Based on the three verses above, we would assume they are references to the same person – but is he the Paul we read about in the Epistles? The name “ Saul ” doesn’t appear in the Epistles. In order to answer that question we must examine the stories of the “ conversion experiences ” of Saul in Acts and Paul in Galatians . Pay close attention to the time periods and places mentioned in both accounts. Saul’s experience is found in Acts 9 and it took

Rabbi Stephen S. Wise’s Sermon at Synagogue on Jewish Jesus Causes a Storm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Samuel_Wise#/media/File:Stephen_Samuel_Wise.jpg Rabbi Stephen S. Wise gave this sermon in late December 1925 and it set off a storm of protests in Jewish communities.  Before you read the article, it is important for you to be aware of some of the accomplishments of Rabbi Wise. ● a founder of the New York Federation of Zionist Societies in 1897 ● first vice-president of the   Oregon State Conference of Charities and Correction in 1902 ● appointed Commissioner of Child Labor for the State of Oregon in 1903 ● co-founded the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) ● founding of American Jewish Congress (AJCongress) in 1918 ● founded the   Jewish Institute of Religion, an educational center in New York City  in 1922 ● founding president of the World Jewish Congress in 1936 (created to fight Nazism) ● co-chair of the American Zionist Emergency Council in WWII ● held press conference